Equalization of Net Family Property and Property Division for Married Spouses in Ontario
In Ontario, when married spouses separate or divorce, the Family Law Act R.S.O. 1990 (“Family Law Act”) requires the equalization of net family property to ensure a fair division of the wealth accumulated during the marriage. This process involves calculating each spouse’s net family property (assets minus debts and liabilities) on the valuation date, typically the date of separation. The spouse with the higher net family property pays half the difference to the other, known as an equalization payment. This approach aims to balance the financial positions without necessarily dividing individual assets.
At Stephen Durbin and Associates, we assist clients with navigating these calculations, addressing exclusions, and resolving disputes to achieve equitable outcomes, and as experienced Ontario family lawyers, we guide clients through complex property division and divorce-related financial issues. Early consultation can help clarify your rights and obligations, reducing potential conflicts.
1-855-694-5222
Find a Lawyer to Help with Equalization and Property Division in Ontario
Navigating the equalization of net family property can be complex, especially when determining asset values, exclusions, or potential unequal divisions. An experienced family lawyer can guide you through the process, ensure accurate disclosures, and advocate for a fair resolution. At Stephen Durbin and Associates, our team has extensive knowledge of the Family Law Act and related case law. We help you compile financial information, negotiate settlements, and, if necessary, litigate to protect your interests. Whether dealing with pensions, businesses, or inherited assets, we provide tailored advice to fit your situation.
What is Equalization of Net Family Property?
Equalization of net family property is the method used in Ontario to divide marital assets fairly upon separation or divorce. Under the Family Law Act, net family property is calculated by subtracting debts and liabilities from the value of assets owned on the valuation date, minus any excluded property such as gifts or inheritances received during the marriage (except the matrimonial home).
See More
The difference between the spouses’ net family properties is then equalized by a payment from the higher-net-worth spouse to the lower one. This ensures both parties share equally in the financial growth during the marriage, promoting fairness without requiring the physical division of assets. This process is fundamental in Ontario property division and forms the basis of most divorce financial arrangements.
Here’s a brief hypothetical scenario:
Scenario: Vladdy and Marie Philip, married for 10 years, decide to divorce. During the marriage, Vladdy earned a high income and accumulated significant assets, including a house valued at $800,000 and a pension worth $200,000. Marie Philip, who stayed home to raise their children, has minimal assets but contributed to the household. Their net family property (NFP) is calculated as follows:
- Vladdy’s NFP: House ($800,000) + Pension ($200,000) – Debts ($50,000) = $950,000.
- Marie Philip’s NFP: Savings ($20,000) – Debts ($5,000) = $15,000.
Equalization Calculation:
- Difference in NFP: $950,000 (Vladdy) – $15,000 (Marie Philip) = $935,000.
- Equalization payment: $935,000 ÷ 2 = $467,500.
Vladdy would owe Marie Philip an equalization payment of $467,500 to ensure both leave the marriage with equal shares of the family property accumulated during the marriage. This could be paid in cash, assets, or a combination, depending on their agreement or court order.
This is a simplified example. Actual cases may involve more complex assets, deductions, or exemptions (e.g., inherited property, earnings from life insurance, proceeds from personal injury etc.). Clients often benefit from legal guidance from an Ontario divorce lawyer to navigate these complexities.
Unequal Division of Net Family Property
While equalization is the standard approach, courts may order an unequal division under section 5(6) of the Family Law Act if equalizing would be unconscionable. This high threshold requires circumstances that “shock the conscience,” such as one spouse’s failure to disclose debts, reckless depletion of assets, or disproportionate results from a short marriage. Factors like intentional financial misconduct or debts incurred to support the family may influence the court’s decision, but mere unfairness is insufficient.
Important Court Cases in Ontario About Equalization and Property Division
Ontario courts and the Supreme Court of Canada have provided key guidance on equalization through landmark decisions. These cases emphasize the importance of accurate valuation, ownership resolution, and the rare application of unequal division. The Supreme Court of Canada
See More
in Rawluk v . Rawluk , [1990] 1 S.C.R. 70 established that constructive trusts may apply to matrimonial property, resolving ownership issues before equalization to prevent unjust enrichment. This ensures equitable treatment under the Family Law Act.
In Serra v. Serra 2009 ONCA 105, the Ontario Court of Appeal set a high bar for unequal division, requiring unconscionability that shocks the conscience, such as post-valuation asset devaluation due to market forces combined with other factors.
The case of Ward v. Ward (2012 ONCA 462) reinforced the presumption of equal division but affirmed courts’ discretion for unequal outcomes in unconscionable scenarios, highlighting factors like reckless depletion. These rulings underscore the need for full disclosure and fair dealings in property division cases. These precedents are frequently cited in Ontario divorce and property division disputes, guiding how courts approach financial settlements.
Pensions and Equalization
Pensions are considered property under the Family Law Act and must be included in the calculation of net family property for equalization purposes when a marriage ends. This can involve intricate valuation and division processes to ensure fairness, particularly for defined benefit pensions or those governed by federal laws.
Additionally, section 10.1 of the Family Law Act permits the immediate transfer of a lump sum from a pension plan, subject to exceptions, especially if the pension holder has begun receiving payments by the valuation date. Given these complexities, seeking guidance from a family law professional is crucial to protect your interests and navigate the relevant provincial and federal frameworks effectively.
Frequently Asked Questions
The valuation date is usually the date of separation, but it can be the date of divorce or death in certain cases. Assets and debts are valued as of that date.
Gifts or inheritances received during the marriage are generally excluded, but subject to certain conditions.
Yes, the matrimonial home is fully included in net family property, regardless of ownership or when acquired.
Courts may consider reckless depletion in deciding on unequal division or imputing values to ensure fairness.
How Can Stephen Durbin and Associates Help You?
We simplify the equalization process by helping you identify and value assets, calculate net family property, and address exclusions or claims for unequal division. Our team collaborates with financial experts like appraisers and accountants to ensure accuracy. If disputes arise, we negotiate agreements or represent you in court, drawing on the Family Law Act and precedents. Our focus is on efficient, fair resolutions tailored to your needs, minimizing stress during this challenging time.
If you require assistance navigating the equalization process, please contact us at
Please complete the form and we’ll get right back to you.
1-855-694-5222